Rachelle Wilde is back this week after a very lackluster site update from Body in Mind
last week which wasn’t even worth mentioning except for one picture of Peta Todd
behind the scenes which was sexy, not for its nudity but for showing her in a very
casual light. The image reminded me that she’s a young woman, and beneath all the styling,
passed her naked figure, she’s just a person, and kind of looked like a Tom Boy.
This week’s update is better with Rachelle. Again, I have a bit of an issue
with her front. Something about her face reads a little old and hard when she looks
directly into the lens. I know a model cannot make a living doing profiles alone,
so I don’t know what the solution to this issue could be. Perhaps if the stylist
toned down the make up a bit. That could be the problem. I see some eye shadow,
there must be some foundation, somebody could just be doing it wrong. I don’t know.
Also, the hair styling, the crimping, I’m not a fan, and it may have something to do
with the impression she makes overall. Her body, is off the charts. Too bad, this
gallery doesn’t really show it off like the Blue Nudes gallery did, but what are you
going to do? I just think an effort should be made to soften her face and shoot her
without styled hair.
The photography is more than competent: the white balance is spot on, exaggerated
to a nice effect, though the set itself and the images feel cramped and needing
space to stretch.
This second set, feels like who turned off the lights? compared to the previous.
Cat, from what I can see is not a remarkable beauty or even a remarkable model. Looking
at her other sets on the site leads me to believe something totally different. I don’t
know if this shoot is all waist up, but to deny us the entirety of Cat, even in just the
preview is useless when she has a figure worth looking at.
What reads about her in this set is charisma and enthusiasm to pose nude, which, depending
on the goals of a shoot, can be the more important and valuable than fantastic poses and,
well beauty with regard to nude models is relative, so throw that one out the window.
Reading the site’s description of the shoot, it seems she’s a bit goofy, as the last picture
of the gallery confirms. I don’t know if that has any appeal to anyone, as the image
is rather dreadful and unflattering.
Anyway, what draws me to this set is the contrast of her complexion to the dark
dark blue, I guess it’s sapphire, background and dress she plays with. I love
the dress as an accessory, and that it comes off. From a distance it almost appears
Grecian, the way it falls on her her body. More than all of that, yes, it’s
coming back to the nipples.
I guess this must be nipple week around here, because she has a pair worth commenting on.
They’re not puffy, but they have texture and remind me of Laeticia I wrote about
a few days ago. Clearly, they aren’t on Laeticia’s level, but unusual for sure.